The commentary by Lena Kampf discusses the dilemma faced by the German government over how to effectively bring to justice German jihadists who have allegedly committed crimes under the Islamic State regime in Syria and Iraq. The cases of individuals like Fared Saal and Martin Lemke, who grew up in Germany and left to engage in what they termed as 'holy war,' illustrate the complexities involved in prosecuting such crimes. Given the nature of their alleged actions, it raises the question of whether justice can truly be achieved by trying them in Germany, away from the affected communities.

Kampf emphasizes the need for the German government to support fair trials for these jihadists in Iraq, the location of their alleged crimes. This approach is aligned with the principles of justice being administered in the context of where the crimes took place, as it allows victims and their families to see the process first-hand. However, this proposition faces significant opposition from the families of the accused, who advocate for their prosecution within the German legal system, citing concerns about fairness and legal complexities involved in overseas trials.

The article ultimately highlights a significant legal and ethical debate surrounding the prosecution of foreign fighters, particularly how countries like Germany navigate their responsibilities towards justice for victims while balancing the rights of individuals accused of grave crimes. It poses intricate questions about jurisdiction, justice, and the appropriate means of accountability in the wake of terrorism.