In a recent commentary for Fox News, journalist David Marcus highlights potential challenges that Stephen A. Smith, a prominent sports media figure, may face should he decide to pursue a presidential run in 2028. He points out that the Democratic Party has a history of resisting the nomination of outsider candidates, a lesson underscored by the experiences of Senator Bernie Sanders, who faced significant pushback from party leaders during his campaigns in 2016 and 2020. Despite Sanders' influence and the success of the progressive movement within the party, the establishment's control remains significant.

Marcus draws a direct comparison between Smith's ambitions and that of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who, after feeling marginalized by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), endorsed Donald Trump for the 2024 presidential race. This reference serves to illustrate how Democratic party dynamics can marginalize even well-known figures, potentially leaving them feeling compelled to seek alternative paths to political influence. Smith's expressed desire to be on the debate stage reflects a similar ambition that was notably rejected by the DNC when RFK Jr. made a similar request.

The implications of Smith's potential run and the Democratic Party's historical reluctance to nominate outsiders could reshape the political landscape, particularly as the party prepares for its primary contests. With candidates like Smith seeking to disrupt the status quo, it remains to be seen how the party establishment will react and whether the internal dissension could align with a broader populist agenda, reminiscent of past campaigns and ideological struggles within the party.