In the second round of indirect talks between Washington and Tehran held in Geneva, Switzerland, there was no definitive direction established for the negotiations. Officials from both sides expressed their views using a mix of diplomatic language and threats. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi described the atmosphere as constructive, proposing that serious discussions led to mutual principles that could pave the way for a potential agreement. However, he was cautious in his optimism, emphasizing that positive vibes do not guarantee a swift deal with Washington.

On the American side, the tone leaned more towards issuing threats rather than expressing optimism, with Axios reporting that a U.S. official acknowledged progress in the Geneva talks while also insisting that many details are still open for discussion. This reflects a significant gap between the two parties' perspectives, indicating that despite some advancements, fundamental disagreements persist.

U.S. officials, including Vice President J.D. Vance, reiterated that substantial issues remain unresolved, with the Iranians reportedly unwilling to acknowledge what President Donald Trump previously outlined as red lines. This situation creates a complex environment for both nations as they navigate the delicate balance between diplomacy and the possibility of increased tensions, leaving the future of negotiations uncertain at this time.