In Brazil, the term 'denialist' has become a common label used in national debates, particularly targeting those who oppose the so-called 'scientific truths.' This label is often applied to individuals whose viewpoints diverge from prevailing scientific narratives, thereby branding them as alienated or misinformed. The article suggests that this tendency to label individuals detracts from meaningful discourse and reinforces a simplistic view of disagreements in understanding complex issues.

The author argues that accusations of denialism cross into everyday life, where people grapple with real dilemmas regarding suffering, care, and well-being. In dealing with these challenges, individuals often explore a diverse range of solutions beyond traditional medicine and Western science. This includes alternative therapies, spiritual practices, astrological insights, and non-Western healing methodologies.

By shifting the focus from individual denialism to a broader understanding of cultural perceptions and motivations, the article advocates for a more nuanced approach to health, well-being, and the recognition that people may draw from various sources to make sense of their experiences. The conversation thus moves away from accusations of denial towards a richer dialogue about the diverse beliefs that shape people's decisions in health and wellness.