Mohamad Kassar, a Lebanese immigrant and permanent resident of Canada for about 35 years, faced deportation after being convicted for trafficking opioids, specifically fentanyl and hydromorphone. Scheduled for removal on February 13, Kassar's situation changed when he received a preliminary diagnosis of a potential lung tumor. Federal Court Justice Angus Grant ruled in favor of Kassar, highlighting the severe medical risks he would face if deported, given his dependence on ongoing medical treatment.

The judge found that Kassar had provided significant evidence of the harm he might experience upon removal, emphasizing his medical vulnerability and the necessity of uninterrupted treatment to manage his condition. This ruling underscores the complexities involved in immigration and deportation cases, particularly when health issues are a determining factor. Kassar's case illustrates a legal pathway that can sometimes allow individuals facing drug-related convictions to remain in the country due to humanitarian considerations.

This development raises questions about the intersection of health, immigration policy, and criminal justice in Canada. Kassar's reprieve is not only a momentary victory for him but also highlights broader implications for how Canadian courts handle deportation cases involving individuals with serious medical conditions. The outcome of Kassar's case could influence future rulings and underscore the need for careful consideration of medical and humanitarian factors in immigration matters.