The Natural Resources Institute Finland, known as Luke, reports a largely positive reception towards nature restoration efforts in Finland's rural regions. Key factors influencing this acceptance include fair compensation for any disadvantages incurred by landowners and evident local benefits from restoration projects. Many in these communities believe that nature restoration enhances landscapes, local comfort, and recreational opportunities, reflecting a growing concern for the health of natural environments, particularly waters.

However, uncertainty and lack of information regarding the implementation of restoration initiatives have been identified as major sources of skepticism among local stakeholders. Concerns are heightened when multiple detrimental actions are directed at the same landowner, potentially undermining land value and creating friction. This suggests that local communities may view restoration either as a threat or an opportunity, depending on their perceived ability to influence the decision-making processes and outcomes of such initiatives.

Ultimately, successful nature restoration requires a bottom-up approach, emphasizing the importance of involving local actors in the planning and execution phases. It is crucial that these projects respect local values, utilize local knowledge, expertise, and resources, rather than being imposed externally. This people-centric perspective could lead to more sustainable and accepted restoration practices, fostering community support and ensuring better ecological outcomes.