The revelation stems from a new biography by Russell Myers, the royal editor for the Mirror, detailing the early signs of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's dissatisfaction with their roles within the Royal Family. According to the book, this discomfort was evident even before the couple's wedding, suggesting deep-rooted issues that would ultimately lead to their decision to step back from royal duties in 2020. Given the insight from palace insiders, the book sheds light on the complexities of the couple's relationship with the royal institution that had largely gone unnoticed.

The biography positions Harry and Meghan's grievances not as spontaneous outbursts but as part of a longer narrative of discontent that began much earlier than previously acknowledged. This adds a new layer to understanding the couple's eventual move away from royal life and their subsequent activities in America, raising questions regarding the Royal Family's approach to modernizing its image and accommodating its members. Understanding these dynamics is crucial, as they highlight ongoing tensions and the challenges the monarchy faces in adapting to contemporary demands.

Furthermore, this revelation could have implications for the public’s perception of the monarchy as it seeks to remain relevant. As royal biographies often shape public narrative, Myers's account could further polarize views on the Sussexes versus the royal institution. It might also provoke discussions around accountability and the treatment of younger royals when navigating traditional expectations alongside personal happiness, potentially influencing future royal engagements and the institution's evolution.