The article discusses the newly established Crisis Youth and Children Law in South Korea, focusing on its implementation and the challenges faced by youth centers.
Last year, South Korea enacted the 'Crisis Youth and Children Law,' aimed at supporting youth and children in crisis situations, specifically those providing care for sick family members or who are isolated from others. Set to be implemented on March 26, the law includes provisions for regular surveys and five-year strategic plans to enhance support across psychological, health, educational, employment, residential, and customized program dimensions. While there has been notable progress since the legal framework was established, questions remain regarding its execution, particularly concerning the adequacy of resources and accessibility for the targeted youth.
The primary support structure for this initiative is the Youth Future Centers, which are to be established in metropolitan areas and split into two teams: one addressing care issues and the other focusing on isolated youth. However, concerns arise about whether having a single center in large regions will adequately serve both demographics, as the needs of these groups can vary dramatically. Moreover, practical issues such as the ability of youth to access these centers raises further doubts. Initial pilot projects with four centers have shown promising results, but the article emphasizes the need for careful planning to ensure these initiatives are effectively implemented and accessible to those in need.
With the Ministry of Health and Welfare stating plans for gradual expansion, there are still concerns regarding the limited operation of only eight centers across the 17 provinces and cities in South Korea. Without dedicated teams in all localities, many youths may remain without adequate support. The article insists on the importance of establishing rapid response systems and adapting existing resources to fit local conditions, rather than rigidly adhering to the proposed format of the Youth Future Centers. The article concludes with a call for thorough engagement with local needs and preferences to enhance the chances of successful implementation of the law.
