The article addresses the recent exclusion of Wladyslaw Heraskewytsch from the Olympics due to the perceived misuse of advertising rights by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). It points out the contradictory and unclear regulations that govern athlete conduct during the Olympics, indicating a lack of transparency and fairness in the enforcement of these rules. The article calls into question whether the IOC has the authority to impose penalties such as disqualification or exclusion without following established legal protocols.

Furthermore, it emphasizes that German athletes cannot be disqualified or have their rights stripped for crossing advertising boundaries set by the IOC. If the IOC wants to hold athletes accountable for violations, it must do so through a national court within an EU member state rather than through the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). This raises significant legal and ethical concerns regarding the IOC's governing practices and the process by which it enforces its rules, advocating for more clarity and public scrutiny in how the IOC operates.

The implications of this situation are profound, as it not only affects individual athletes but also questions the accountability of the IOC itself. By bringing this to a public court, there could be broader ramifications for how international sports governance is conducted, potentially leading to reforms that enhance fairness and transparency in athletic competition. The article serves as a call to action for systemic changes to ensure athletes' rights are upheld against monopolistic practices by governing bodies like the IOC.