The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) in Mexico has granted an amparo to a woman who was sentenced to more than 27 years in prison for aggravated kidnapping. This decision came after the court unanimously agreed that her case should be reassessed by a collegiate court, specifically emphasizing the need to analyze it through the lens of gender and intersectionality. The woman was convicted in connection with a kidnapping that took place in May 2013, where the victim described her as someone who provided food and restrained them, raising questions about the fairness of her sentencing and treatment during the judicial process.

In her defense, the woman argued against the legality of her detention and raised concerns regarding the photographic and voice evidence used against her, as well as the lack of investigation into potential torture during her apprehension. This case garnered attention for its implications on how the judicial system in Mexico treats women accused of serious crimes and the importance of considering gender-based factors in legal proceedings. The project presenting the amparo was introduced by Minister María Estela Ríos González, highlighting a progressive shift in addressing women's rights in the context of criminal justice.

The SCJN's ruling could have broader implications for similar cases in Mexico, signaling a potential change in how the legal system addresses gender dynamics in crimes, particularly those involving women. This decision reinforces the need for judicial practices that not only seek justice but also understand the unique circumstances surrounding female defendants. As Mexican society grapples with issues of gender violence and systemic discrimination, the outcome of this case may influence future legislative and judicial approaches to crimes involving women and contribute to evolving discussions on intersectionality within the law.