The Argentine government is advancing its labor reform bill, which will return to the Senate for confirmation following the House's decision to eliminate the controversial Article 44, related to sick leave. The removal of this article has sparked debate among legislators, as it highlights the murky origins of its content. While it is agreed that changes were prompted by the Executive branch, no single lawmaker has claimed full responsibility for the final version.

Senators involved in the legislative discussions have pointed out that the modifications were initiated by the government; however, neither Patricia Bullrich, the head of the ruling party, nor her counterpart Victoria Villarruel, specified the actual author of the reform's language. This lack of clarity raises questions about accountability and transparency in the legislative process, especially given the significant implications that these reforms could have on employment laws and workers' rights.

The original proposal was co-signed by President Javier Milei and key cabinet ministers but underwent substantial amendments before reaching the Senate, particularly regarding medical certificates. The nature of these changes and the absence of a clear author reflect ongoing tensions within the government and a possible pushback against comprehensive labor reforms. As Argentina navigates this complex process, the implications of the new regulatory framework for sick leave remain uncertain for both employees and employers alike.