French ice dancers Laurence Fournier Beaudry and Guillaume Cizeron are addressing criticism over their gold medal win at the Milan Cortina Olympics, which has been surrounded by controversy due to the scoring by judges. Notably, a French judge's decision to score Beaudry and Cizeron nearly eight points higher than their American counterparts, Madison Chock and Evan Bates, sparked a debate on score fairness and judging criteria, leading to questions regarding the objectivity of the scoring system.

The criticism intensified as it was revealed that without the high score from the French judge, Chock and Bates would have won gold instead of settling for silver. In response, Beaudry and Cizeron asserted their belief that their performance was more technically superior than that of the American team, indicating a strong conviction in their skills and execution during the event. Cizeron remarked on the competitive aspect, expressing a desire to win by a significant margin, yet acknowledged that certain mistakes during the routine did affect their score.

This scenario highlights a recurring issue in competitive figure skating regarding judging biases and the transparency of score allocation, particularly in a sport where subjective judgments can heavily influence medal outcomes. The French duo's comments reflect not only their defense of their skills but also contribute to a broader discussion on the need for reforms in judging practices to ensure fair competition in international events.