The recent decision by Minister Alexandre de Moraes to investigate data leaks from the Federal Revenue concerning ministers and their families has sparked significant criticism from members of the National Congress and the Supreme Federal Court (STF). The investigation was linked to the ongoing 'Fake News Inquiry' initiated in 2019, which targets alleged attacks by Bolsonaro supporters against the court. This overlap has raised concerns about the appropriateness of the investigative approach taken by Moraes, as critics argue it conflates distinct judicial matters.

Within the STF, there are divided opinions on the validity of Moraes' methods. Some justices believe that the operation should not have been conducted under the auspices of the Fake News Inquiry, suggesting that a separate inquiry should have been initiated based on a request from the Attorney General's Office (PGR). The disagreement hints at a deeper contention regarding the boundaries of judicial authority and the proper procedures for investigating sensitive matters involving high-level officials. This situation underscores the ongoing tensions between various branches of the Brazilian government and raises questions about the accountability in cases of potential misconduct.

Moreover, the pushback against Moraes’ investigation can be seen as part of a larger narrative of political strife and legal battles in Brazil, where the judicial system often finds itself entangled in conflicts with the legislative branch. As various actors within the political landscape react to this inquiry, it highlights not just the immediate implications for those directly involved but also the broader repercussions for the integrity of Brazil's democratic institutions.