In Sweden, a new repatriation grant was introduced this year, allowing eligible individuals to claim up to 350,000 kronor for return assistance. Since its implementation, nearly 300 people have applied for this support. However, the Swedish Migration Agency has rejected all applications on grounds such as the presence of debts, regardless of their size. This has sparked concerns about the criteria set for these grants and the efficacy of the program in aiding individuals considering repatriation.

The backlash against this program has grown, particularly following the response of Jokkmokk Municipality, which declined the government's invitation to voluntary repatriation initiatives. This decision has prompted other municipalities to join in the protests against the government's approach to voluntary returns. Critics, including various review bodies, argue that the signal sent by implementing such financial support could be misinterpreted by newcomers to Sweden, which could affect their integration and prospects in the country.

There is an evident disconnect between the Migration Agency and the target group, as highlighted by the Swedish Public Employment Service, which points out a conflict between directing individuals towards employment and informing them about repatriation support. As more people learn about the enhanced grant, the administration's challenge remains in addressing the outreach and conditions that currently hinder applicants from receiving the aid they seek, raising further questions about the overall strategy of repatriation assistance from the government.