Feb 17 • 16:03 UTC 🇫🇷 France France24

Why Russia may have turned to dart-frog toxin epibatidine to poison Navalny

European countries have identified epibatidine as the poison that killed Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, two years after his death in prison.

Two years after the death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in prison, an investigation led by five European countries—Britain, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and Sweden—has concluded that he was poisoned with a highly toxic substance known as epibatidine, derived from the South American poison dart frog. The findings were presented alongside the Munich Security Conference, marking a critical moment in international attention to Russia's treatment of political dissidents. The substance, being both rare and exotic, raises questions about why Russian authorities would resort to such a means of assassination.

Experts suggest that the use of epibatidine demonstrates a level of calculated risk on Russia's part, exposing their willingness to employ unconventional and lethal methods against opposition figures. Given Navalny's high profile as a vocal critic of the Kremlin, the choice of such a rare toxin may imply that he was subjected to a sinister experiment, leading to speculations about the broader implications for other dissidents under threat. Such actions not only underline the urgency for international accountability but also cast light on the dangers faced by dissidents, further highlighting the Kremlin's ongoing campaign against political opposition.

The investigation's findings contradict Russia's statement claiming Navalny died of natural causes. As international scrutiny intensifies following the presentation of these findings, it sets the stage for potential diplomatic responses and calls for renewed actions against the Russian government, possibly influencing international relations and responses to human rights violations in the region. The utilization of toxic agents in political games may invoke broader conversations about bioethical standards and the implications of using biological toxins in state-sponsored acts of violence.

📡 Similar Coverage