The article discusses the implications of U.S. President Donald Trump's suggestion to buy Greenland from Denmark, an idea that prompted outrage in Europe and was viewed as outdated imperialism. However, the article argues that the history of American expansion is filled with territorial purchases made during moments of power imbalance, suggesting that the practice is not as far removed from modern politics as some believe. The outrage over Trump's proposal is contrasted with historical precedents where the U.S. acquired land through negotiations and purchases, highlighting a recurring theme in the nation's development.

This reaction to Trump's comments also reflects a deeper tension regarding historical narratives about U.S. territorial growth, with many in Europe perceiving such discussions as signs of neocolonialist attitudes. The article emphasizes that while the concept of buying land today may seem outlandish, it is important to recognize the reality of how the U.S. was shaped through both conflict and commerce. This duality in the nation's expansionist history raises questions about the ethics of such practices in contemporary geopolitics.

Ultimately, the article posits that the debate surrounding the suggestion to buy Greenland serves as a mirror to examine broader themes of power, historical entitlement, and the evolving nature of international relations. Thus, it urges readers to consider whether such deals might still carry relevance in today's world, despite the moral implications that may arise from them.