In a response to an opinion piece, representatives of the Ethical Council at Sweden's Migration Agency clarify its role and responsibilities. They emphasize that the council is not meant to comment on individual cases of deportation but to provide insights on the agency's operational design in relation to ethical considerations. This distinction raises questions about the council's actual influence and effectiveness in shaping migration policies.

The debate centers on whether the Ethical Council is merely a symbolic presence without the power to impact significant decisions regarding deportations. Critics like Bengt Andersson are concerned that the council's lack of direct involvement in individual cases undermines its authority and relevance. This issue is particularly pertinent as Sweden grapples with heightened scrutiny of its immigration policies and practices.

The clarification from the council highlights the necessity of understanding the boundaries of its mandate and raises important ethical questions surrounding migration decisions. This ongoing discourse reflects a broader struggle between ethical considerations and bureaucratic processes in the context of immigration and human rights in Sweden.