International Politics Has Turned into a Game of Chicken
Historian Jan Tesař argues that modern democracy raises crucial moral questions about the accountability of leaders in decisions of war, especially in light of Russia's war against Ukraine.
In a comprehensive essay, historian Jan Tesař discusses the significant shift of responsibility entailed in declaring war in the 20th century, contrasting the past when only a few individuals influenced such monumental decisions. He emphasizes that in modern democracies, decisions leading to war present serious moral dilemmas, particularly regarding whether leaders can justifiably go to war against the expressed will of the majority of their constituents. This moral quandary has been heightened since the onset of the full-scale war waged by Russia against Ukraine, leading European leaders to grapple with these issues amid increasing tensions.
Amid global tensions, the actions and statements of powerful figures, such as Donald Trump's renewed interest in Greenland, provoke concern among European leaders about escalating conflicts not only with adversaries but potentially with their primary ally, the United States. This situation raises uncomfortable questions about the nature of alliances and the emerging crisis of democratic leadership in times of military aggression, suggesting that Europe may have to reconsider its geopolitical stance should traditional alliances falter.
Ultimately, Tesař's insights underscore the complex interplay between democracy and war, highlighting that as international relations become more precarious, European nations may face the unsettling reality of dealing with dilapidated alliances—raising the point that perhaps, in the modern global stage, Europe may no longer need enemies if it can no longer rely on its historical friends and allies.