The article explores the phenomenon of construction speed in dictatorships, suggesting that such regimes often complete projects more quickly than democratic countries. This efficiency is attributed to centralized decision-making, fewer bureaucratic hurdles, and the ability to bypass extensive regulatory processes. In particular, the piece contrasts this with the situation in the Czech Republic under Prime Minister Andrej Babiš, hinting at stagnation in construction projects amid political controversies and regulatory delays.

The author presents a critical viewpoint towards Babiš's administration, implying that the government's approach has led to inefficiencies in construction management and urban development. Despite high expectations surrounding infrastructure projects, deadlines and budgets are frequently overruns in the Czech context, contrasting sharply with the swift developments often seen in less democratic nations. This raises questions about governance and the impact of political circumstances on national progress.

Overall, the article serves as a commentary on the implications of political governance styles on national infrastructure and construction efforts. It encourages readers to consider how leadership influences development outcomes and whether democratic processes ultimately hinder or help in achieving timely project completions.