Feb 17 • 04:30 UTC 🇪🇸 Spain El País

Zarzalejo, from Ayuso's whip against Begoña Gómez to new Education Counselor

Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the President of Madrid, has replaced Emilio Viciana as Education Counselor with Mercedes Zarzalejo, a hardliner in the party who previously served as spokesperson in a controversial investigation involving Begoña Gómez.

In a significant political move, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the President of the Community of Madrid, has dismissed Emilio Viciana from his role as Education Counselor, a position filled with controversy and frequent replacements during his tenure. Viciana's time in office was marked by public disputes and dissatisfaction, prompting Ayuso to seek a change in leadership within the education sector. The choice of Mercedes Zarzalejo Carbajo, a known hardliner within the Popular Party (PP), signals Ayuso’s intent to reinforce her political stance and align education policy more closely with her administration's values.

Mercedes Zarzalejo was previously the spokesperson for the PP during an investigative commission that scrutinized Begoña Gómez, the spouse of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, regarding alleged favoritism linked to her employment at the Complutense University of Madrid. The decision to appoint Zarzalejo comes at a time when education policy is under intense scrutiny and debate, particularly around discussions of university reforms. By entrusting Zarzalejo with this responsibility, Ayuso seems to be signaling a decisive shift in how education will be managed, likely reflecting the more conservative and hardline policies of the party.

This move has broader implications for the political landscape in Madrid and potentially for national politics as well, as it highlights the growing tensions between the PP and the more moderate approaches represented by the national government led by Sánchez. The appointment of a figure like Zarzalejo, closely tied to controversial political actions, may invigorate hardline policies in educational matters while simultaneously raising questions about political motivations behind education reforms and the administration’s approach to accountability in public office.

📡 Similar Coverage