In Sweden, there has been a rising trend among schools to implement a zero-tolerance policy against rough play, which is seen as a way to abide by school laws and prevent instances of bullying and harassment. This often results in children being discouraged from engaging in physical interactions, leading some to argue that such restrictions may hinder their social development. Critics of this approach, including certain researchers, highlight the negative implications of a strictly enforced zero-tolerance stance, claiming it fosters fear among children regarding physical contact and interaction.

Conversely, recent Swedish and international research suggests that rough play, which researchers refer to as 'roughhousing,' can actually mitigate aggression-related problems when conducted in a healthy and regulated manner. Such play is asserted to have various benefits for children's development, including teaching them to respect each other's boundaries and consider their peers' feelings. By embracing safe rough play, children can develop stronger social skills and resilience, contradicting the fear that such activities lead to unacceptable behavior.

The Swedish Public Health Agency is now advocating for more risky outdoor play, emphasizing the importance of wild games and activities at heights, which are believed to improve social relationships and enhance children's ability to assess risks. Pilo Stylin, a spokesperson for the martial arts federation, argues against the prohibition of rough play in schools, citing that it infringes upon children's rights to development as recognized by the Convention on the Rights of the Child. As schools grapple with these issues, the balance between ensuring safety and fostering healthy developmental opportunities for children remains a critical conversation.