The article discusses the criticism directed at Anne Weider Aasen, the leader of Norway’s Pressens Faglige Utvalg (PFU), regarding the significant decline in the approval rate for complaints, which is reported to be only 15% in 2025, a drop from a previous rate of 35%. Aasen has been accused of evading the main question of accountability concerning the PFU and its handling of complaints against the press. Critics argue that the media should not have sole control over the PFU, especially given the low rate of upheld complaints which challenges the credibility and independence of the media in Norway.

Aasen's defense for the low acceptance rate hinges on the claim that a majority of the complaints are baseless, which has raised eyebrows among media analysts and advocacy groups. It is noted that even though there were a higher number of complaints reaching full consideration by the PFU—139 in total, the highest in a decade—very few have been successful. This situation suggests a potential disconnect between public grievance and institutional accountability within the press.

The article also touches upon suggestions that might improve the situation, such as having independent bodies, including the Civil Ombudsman and the Norwegian Bar Association, appoint PFU members as is done in Sweden. Advocates argue that such measures could enhance the credibility and accountability of the PFU, ultimately strengthening the position of the press by ensuring it is more responsible and trustworthy, rather than undermining its independence.