Federal prosecutors in Argentina are pushing for Judge Pablo Díaz Lacava to face a public trial due to serious allegations of threats and harassment directed towards employees of his court in La Pampa. The accusations not only include workplace harassment but also involve incidents characterized as gender-based violence, with reports of physical aggression, such as attacking a staff member with a stone. This widespread concern raised by judicial sources highlights the troubling conduct of a sitting federal judge towards his subordinates and spells serious repercussions for the integrity of the judicial system.

The prosecutors, namely Horacio Azzolin, Iara J. Silvestre, and Federico Iparraguirre, have concluded a significant phase of their investigation and are focused on various charges against Díaz Lacava. The charges range from simple and aggravated threats to injuries committed within a context of violence, as well as labor abuse, abuse of authority, and failure to act according to his public duties. The judge also faces restrictions on his interactions with court staff, emphasizing the severity of the situation and the need for judicial accountability.

Díaz Lacava has publicly denied the allegations, asserting that he has not engaged in any inappropriate behavior or committed any crimes. This case raises important questions about the safeguards and regulations within the judicial system in Argentina, particularly concerning the treatment of court employees and the appropriate conduct expected from judges. As the case progresses, it may set important precedents regarding accountability and professional conduct within the judiciary, especially in the context of addressing gender-based violence in the workplace.