Against Støre: – Either he doesn't understand, or he is trying to wriggle out
Hilde Henriksen Waage criticizes Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre over the handling of missing documents from the Oslo peace process, linking it to Terje Rød-Larsen's recent revelations.
Hilde Henriksen Waage, a Middle East researcher and history professor, has expressed serious concerns regarding Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre's actions concerning significant missing documents from the Oslo peace process in the 1990s. The issue has resurfaced due to recent revelations about Terje Rød-Larsen, who, along with his partner Mona Juul, gained diplomatic credentials through Norway's involvement in the Middle East peace negotiations. Waage's research unearthed that key documents were mysteriously absent from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs archives during a crucial nine-month period of the Oslo process, raising questions about transparency and accountability in Norway's peace efforts.
Waage, who was involved in a research project about the Oslo peace process back in 2001, reported that both the Norwegian Foreign Ministry and the National Archives began investigating the disappearance of these documents in 2006. During that investigation, Rød-Larsen admitted to possessing some of these documents in his personal archive but refused to share them. This situation was complicated further when Waage noted that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs halted their inquiries into these missing documents in the same year, a decision that coincided with Støre’s term as Foreign Minister. The implications of this situation suggest a possible cover-up or negligence in handling crucial historical records, and Waage firmly believes that these documents could potentially change the narrative regarding Norway's contribution to the peace process.
The controversy surrounding the document's absence raises significant ethical questions about governmental transparency and historical accountability in Norway. As public figures like Støre play critical roles in shaping Norway's foreign policy, Waage's implications pose a challenge to the integrity of those in power. The ongoing discussions may not only influence public opinion regarding the foreign ministry's actions but could also lead to calls for greater oversight and reforms to prevent similar occurrences in the future, impacting Norway's diplomatic reputation in the global context.