The freestyle events at the Milano-Cortina Olympics have ignited discussion over the fairness and subjectivity of the judging process. A notable instance was reported by Yle commentator Sami Saarenpää, who claimed that Finnish athlete Kuura Koivisto had been "robbed" in the qualifying round of the freeski big air competition. Despite delivering a strong performance with scores of 88.25 and 80.75 in her runs, Koivisto ended up just outside the qualifying spots for the finals with a total score of 169.

Expert Juho Kilkki from Yle Sports agreed with Saarenpää's assessment, indicating that Koivisto's performance deserved higher scores than what the judges awarded. He pointed out that this incident is indicative of the broader challenges in judging freestyle sports, where the evaluation is often subjective and relies heavily on personal interpretation by the judges. This subjectivity can lead to discrepancies in scoring, leaving spectators and even experts perplexed about the outcomes.

The intense scrutiny of such judging decisions not only affects athletes personally but also shapes public perception of the sport. As discussions about fairness and transparency continue, it raises questions about how judges are trained and whether a standardization of scoring criteria could help mitigate similar controversies in the future. The case of Kuura Koivisto exemplifies a growing concern among fans and analysts regarding the integrity of competitive judging in freestyle disciplines.