The 39th summit of the African Union recently took place, ending with a declaration aimed at 'silencing the guns' and committing to a zero-tolerance approach towards unconstitutional changes of government. Notably, the summit raised concerns about the legitimacy of democratically elected leaders who have previously participated in coups, as stated by Paul-Simon Handy, a researcher and director at the Institute for Security Studies in East Africa. His insights emphasize the tension between democratic processes and the past actions of some leaders, questioning the effectiveness of such commitments in achieving lasting political stability.

Handy, speaking from Addis Ababa, underscored the importance of accountability and adherence to constitutionalism in promoting peace in Africa. This discussion is particularly timely given the rising number of coups in the region, which have led to increased instability and violence. The sentiment echoed by many participants at the summit reflects a growing recognition that merely electing leaders does not ensure adherence to democratic principles, especially when these leaders have histories of seizing power unlawfully.

As the African Union seeks to navigate these complex challenges, the outcome of this summit has significant implications for the continent's future political landscape. The call to action against unconstitutional rule could shape future elections and governance models, pushing for a political culture where respect for democratic norms is paramount. However, the question remains whether member states will implement these ideals effectively or continue to struggle with the legacies of past coups and political unrest.