In a recent letter to the editor, Jörgen Johansson proposes a significant shift in the way state energy support is calculated in Sweden. Currently, the support is based on the average price of electricity over the month, which does not reflect the true fluctuations in energy costs. Johansson suggests that the government should instead adopt a policy where the state support is determined by the three highest power peak prices of the month. This approach would align state expenses more closely with the actual costs consumers face during peak demand hours.

Johansson's argument follows the recent implementation of effect charges, which are designed to make consumers pay more for electricity during the highest consumption hours. By linking state subsidies to peak prices, Johansson believes it would create a fairer system that would incentivize more efficient energy use and encourage infrastructure improvements. For example, he mentions that drawing from the highest peak prices of 3.86, 3.20, and 2.80 kronor could provide a clearer reflection of the economic pressures faced by consumers.

This proposed change has broader implications, particularly in the context of ongoing discussions about energy sustainability and the financial burden on households. If enacted, it could also reshape how both consumers and companies view electricity consumption, promoting a shift towards conservation during peak hours. As Sweden continues to navigate its energy policies amid rising costs and climate considerations, such proposals will be crucial for ensuring equitable support for its citizens.