A recent drop test conducted by Iltalehti demonstrated that liquid protective films marketed for smartphone screens do not provide the same level of protection as tempered glass. The test showed that when subjected to simple drop conditions, the nanop coatings failed to adequately safeguard the device from damage. This raises concerns about the effectiveness of such coatings and their promotion in retail markets as viable alternatives to traditional screen protectors.

The liquid films, commonly sold in stores, are designed to form a protective layer on the phone screen, aiming to resist scratches and impacts. However, the new findings suggest that consumers may be misled regarding the real-world durability these products offer. With smartphones being a significant investment for many, the potential for damage when relying on these coatings instead of sturdy tempered glass can lead to increased repair costs and user frustration.

This investigation highlights the importance of proper testing and consumer awareness when purchasing screen protection products. As the market continues to expand with various new materials and technologies, consumers should be informed of the limitations and effectiveness of new protective solutions, ensuring they make the best choice for their devices.