The article discusses the recent criticisms surrounding the choice of the Stelvio slope in Bormio as a venue for Olympic alpine skiing events. While the slope is praised for its suitability for downhill and Super-G events, it is criticized for slalom disciplines, which were likened to 'child races for adults' due to the flat ending portion of the course. The lack of proper facilities for slalom races raises concerns about the integrity and quality of the Olympic competitions.

The commentary points out that the decision to host the slalom events at Stelvio instead of the more suitable Tofana was influenced by political decisions favoring the inclusion of northern Italy rather than the best sporting conditions. This choice reflects a broader issue within Olympic preparations, where marketing and regional representation can overshadow the importance of athletic performance and safety. The implications of this decision extend beyond just the athletes; they reflect on the Olympic committee's priorities and the overall perception of the Games.

Ultimately, the article argues that while Bormio offers a magnificent venue for certain types of ski events, the inadequacies of the slalom courses may tarnish the reputation of these Olympic Games and diminish the experience for athletes and spectators alike. Hence, the piece calls for a reassessment of venues for future winter games to ensure that sport integrity is maintained.