This article examines the differing methods of dealing with beavers in Plzeň and its neighboring town of Tojice, Czechia. In Plzeň, the local government has taken a controversial stance by allowing the shooting of beavers, a practice aimed at controlling their population due to concerns around property damage and ecological balance. This decision has sparked debates about the ethical implications and effectiveness of such wildlife management strategies.

Conversely, Tojice has embraced the beaver population as a unique tourist draw, creating attractions that educate visitors about beavers and their role in the ecosystem. This approach not only promotes wildlife conservation but also encourages eco-tourism, showing a more positive and proactive interaction with nature. The contrast between the two towns showcases the ongoing struggle to find a balance between human needs and wildlife preservation.

The implications of these differing strategies are significant. While Plzeň’s measures may address immediate concerns regarding beaver-related damage, they raise important questions about wildlife ethics and conservation. The Tojice example highlights alternative approaches that focus on education and sustainable tourism, suggesting that local governments can consider more harmonious ways to coexist with wildlife.