The article explores the motivations behind Russia's continued assaults on Ukraine's energy grid, framing these actions as strategic rather than purely destructive. While Western media typically label these strikes as acts of terrorism directed at civilians, the article argues that such characterizations overlook the complexities of military strategy. It suggests that if Russia truly aimed to collapse Ukraine's society through misery, it would have executed this strategy sooner in the conflict, indicating that current strikes are not meant to create immediate human suffering but serve other military objectives.

Furthermore, the piece explains that these attacks are intended to create distractions, shifting focus away from more critical areas within the war effort. The author posits that by targeting energy supplies, Russia may seek to stretch Ukraine's military capabilities, forcing them to invest more in missile defense systems and other forms of structural reinforcement. This is seen as a tactic to dilute Ukraine’s attention and resources, rather than a direct challenge to military fronts where actual combat occurs, suggesting a deeper strategic layer to the ongoing conflict.

Finally, while the strikes on the energy grid may not significantly impact frontline combat, they are recognized as operations with long-term implications. The narrative positions these actions as psychological warfare intended to weaken Ukrainian morale and hinder societal functions, emphasizing that the Kremlin's operations are calculated maneuvers designed to gain advantages in a prolonged conflict, rather than merely acts of terror against civilians.