Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico recently proposed the discontinuation of Sunday political discussions, advocating for the day to be a time of peace and relaxation. He encouraged leaders of all political parties to sign an agreement to eliminate these discussions, emphasizing that Sundays should be reserved for enjoying meals rather than engaging in political debates. While his intentions received applause from some members of the public, the proposal did not resonate with most of his coalition partners and was dismissed by the opposition parties, save for the Christian Democratic Movement (KDH).

Following the initial proposal, Fico escalated his campaign by reaching out to television executives with a letter urging them to collaboratively cease the Sunday four-hour political discussion marathon. However, his appeal was largely ignored, with only public television showing a willingness to at least discuss the matter. Despite public resistance, the Sunday political debates continued, underscoring the gap between Fico's vision of a peaceful Sunday and the reality of political engagement that remains prevalent in Slovakia, particularly among his party, Smer.

This clash highlights the complex dynamics of Slovak politics, where attempts to alter long-standing practices like Sunday discussions reveal deeper partisan divides. The continued popularity of such debates and the presence of political figures like Andrej Danko at these events indicate a robust appetite for political discourse, countering the Prime Minister's push for a more serene Sunday. Fico's proposals not only point to a potential reshaping of public engagement in politics but also demonstrate the difficulties he faces in garnering widespread support for his initiatives.