In her recent critique, Caren Miosga highlights the consensus among European leaders that Europe must become more independent, particularly in the context of security and nuclear deterrence. During this year's Munich Security Conference, she references a speech by American Vice President J.D. Vance from the previous year, in which he claimed the greatest threat to Europe comes from within, reflecting a level of internal division and the influence of external ideologies.

The current discourse, as captured in Miosga's analysis, indicates a shift towards prioritizing nuclear deterrence in European security strategy, as emphasized by German politician Merz. He sought to distance himself from the cultural battles associated with the American MAGA movement, reflecting a desire among European leaders to assert a different identity and stance in global politics. Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's presence and comments reinforced the theme of transatlantic unity amid changing geopolitical dynamics.

Ultimately, the critique poses important questions about Europe's future security architecture and the competing narratives surrounding nuclear deterrence versus internal challenges. By framing the atomic bomb as not the main issue, Miosga invites a deeper exploration of how European states can navigate their security needs while maintaining a cohesive political stance in a rapidly evolving world.