The political discourse in India has escalated around the comparison between historical figures Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Tipu Sultan, with significant attention drawing from AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi. Owaisi has vocally criticized the BJP for their stance in this debate, inferring that their narratives overlook the bravery exhibited by Tipu Sultan, who died fighting the British. He further amplifies his argument by contrasting this with Savarkar's legacy, whom he accuses of having submitted to the British by writing letters of appeasement.

In his address in Hyderabad, Owaisi underscored the valor of Tipu Sultan, emphasizing that unlike some figures who sought reconciliation with British rulers, Tipu Sultan fought fiercely against them, ultimately becoming a martyr in the struggle for Indian independence. He pointed out that even in death, Tipu Sultan instilled fear in the British troops, who hesitated to approach his body for fear of his ferocity.

This debate touches upon the heart of India's colonial history and the narratives surrounding national heroes, stirring sentiments among various political and social groups. By bringing figures like Mahatma Gandhi and APJ Abdul Kalam into the conversation, Owaisi aims to reclaim Tipu Sultan's legacy as a symbol of unity between Hindus and Muslims in India, challenging narratives that seek to polarize and divide. The implications of this discussion may influence current political landscapes, particularly as communal identities continue to be a significant factor in Indian politics.