The first court hearing for Naveed Akram, a 24-year-old suspect in the Sydney attack, was conducted via video from jail, marking his first statement in court. This session primarily revolved around a temporary injunction that prohibits the revelation of the identities of survivors from the tragic incident that occurred on December 14 during Hanukkah celebrations at Bondi Beach. While the order restricts media from naming survivors, individuals are free to disclose their identities if they choose to do so.

The attack led to the loss of 15 lives and resulted in several injuries, drawing significant media attention and public outcry. Naveed Akram's father, Sajid, who was also connected to the attack, was killed by police during the incident. During the court proceedings, Akram acknowledged awareness of the discussions surrounding the survivor naming ban but refrained from making any substantial statements regarding the charges against him.

After the hearing, Akram's attorney, Ben Archbold, remarked that it was too early to determine how his client would respond to the charges, noting their anticipation for the prosecution's evidence disclosure. This case continues to capture public concern as details emerge about the events surrounding the Bondi Beach attack and its aftermath, impacting how the criminal justice system handles similar cases in the future.