The article explores the complexities of human trafficking, particularly in light of the Epstein files and a new criminal investigation in Lithuania concerning trafficking. It addresses critical questions about what constitutes trafficking, emphasizing that consent does not necessarily negate exploitation. The analysis presented highlights the vulnerability of individuals involved and the methods employed by traffickers to capitalize on that vulnerability, outlining how this situation is being interpreted legally and morally.

The interview discusses the limits of identifying individuals named in the Epstein files and when their names can be publicly disclosed. This level of scrutiny has sparked a national conversation in Lithuania about the definitions of trafficking versus voluntary travel for women and girls. The legal distinctions between these two concepts have significant implications for ongoing and future investigations.

Ultimately, the article aims to clarify what human trafficking is and what it isn't, summarizing it simply as the recruitment of vulnerable individuals into exploitation. This understanding is crucial for shaping public policy and legal frameworks as Lithuania grapples with the ramifications of this issue and seeks to provide additional protections for at-risk populations.