Lars Calmfors: The Riksbank did a good job - but we should consider replacing it
Lars Calmfors argues that the Riksbank has performed well amid challenges but suggests it may be time to reevaluate its structure in light of recent evaluations.
Lars Calmfors's opinion piece in Dagens Nyheter reflects on the performance of Sweden's central bank, the Riksbank, amid a decade marked by fluctuating monetary policies. Criticized at times for being either too expansive or too strict, the Riksbank's actions have elicited assessments from economists that highlight both successes and areas for improvement. The article points to a comprehensive evaluation conducted by Morten Ravn and Carolyn Wilkins, which has prompted discussions about the effectiveness of the Riksbank’s strategies and its interactions with Sweden's broader economic policies.
The evaluation, covering the period from 2015 to 2024, acknowledges that the Riksbank managed its responsibilities well during unprecedented challenges, particularly through unconventional monetary tools employed during the pandemic and in the years following. Special emphasis is placed on the usage of negative interest rates and significant bond purchases, which were part of the Riksbank's efforts to stabilize the economy. However, despite these successes, the report suggests that there remain opportunities to enhance the Riksbank’s policy framework and its collaborative efforts with fiscal components of the government.
Calmfors suggests that while the Riksbank has shown adaptability and a degree of success, the current economic landscape may necessitate a reassessment of the institution’s leadership and approach. Acknowledging the pressures of global economic challenges, he underscores the need for the Riksbank to not only reflect upon its past actions but also to remain agile and responsive to future demands, indicating that leadership changes may be warranted to ensure continued effectiveness in managing Sweden's monetary policy.