Wim Wenders, the head of the main jury at the Berlin Film Festival, made headlines during his first press conference by distancing cinema from politics. He argued that while films may not change political realities, they can profoundly influence people's perspectives. Wenders highlighted the difference between public sentiments and governmental actions, asserting that watching films provides insights into human suffering and aspirations that often go unnoticed in standard news media.

Following Wenders' remarks, Polish jury member Ewa Puszczyńska responded to questions regarding the German government's support for Israel and its selective solidarity with oppressed nations. She emphasized that films should transcend politics, reinforcing Wenders' notion that cinema embodies empathy and fosters understanding. Puszczyńska criticized framing cinema within political contexts, indicating that such inquiries might be inappropriate, especially given the debates surrounding artistic representation in a politically charged environment.

The discussion surrounding Wenders and the jury members reflects broader tensions in the film industry about the intersection of art and politics. As the festival unfolds, the implications of these conversations may reignite debates about the responsibilities of filmmakers and the role of cinema in societal discourse, especially amid ongoing global conflicts. Media reactions to the remarks by both Wenders and Puszczyńska could further complicate the festival's narrative, significantly impacting attendees' and viewers' perceptions of the films presented.