The article highlights the long-standing existence of nuclear weapons in the world, emphasizing their use only twice in history during World War II when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It reflects on the subsequent tensions during the Cold War, particularly the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, where the strategies of deterrence were developed, leading to the construction of significant arsenals by both the United States and the Soviet Union (now Russia). These developments minimized the chances of a first-strike advantage.

The piece underscores the importance of nuclear arms control agreements that have historically provided both transparency and predictability, allowing the involved nations to avoid dangerous arms races. As the expiration of the New START treaty poses new challenges, the article argues that it is crucial to rethink our approach towards nuclear weapons to avoid escalation and ensure global security.

Furthermore, the author, an esteemed figure in international relations, urges a reevaluation of strategic assumptions related to nuclear deterrence. The analysis suggests that a paradigm shift in understanding and managing nuclear weapons could foster more effective policies for disarmament and international stability moving forward.