In the wake of disputes between the Tidö parties concerning immigration policy, Swedish Democrats (SD) leader Gustav Gellerbrant claimed an agreement had been reached. However, representatives from the Liberal Party (L), Christian Democrats (KD), and Moderate Party (M) quickly countered this assertion, indicating that substantial issues remain unresolved. Liza-Maria Norlin, a spokesperson for the Christian Democrats, specifically highlighted that it is more than just details that need to be finalized, questioning the accuracy of Gellerbrant's statement.

Following these claims, members from various parties responded vigorously. A source from the Liberal Party refuted SD's assertions, emphasizing that there was no consensus on the proposed immigration measures and dismissing the relevant investigation as inadequate. Additionally, a member from the Moderate Party echoed these concerns, labeling the investigation as significantly flawed in many critical aspects. Such contradictions among the Tidö parties suggest ongoing tensions regarding a crucial policy area that is likely to impact Sweden's political landscape.

The immigration policy debate illustrates the complexities within the coalition government and the challenges faced in reaching unified stances on sensitive issues. As the investigation into immigration matters progresses, the uncertainty sown by these conflicting statements raises questions about the future of the coalition's governance and its ability to navigate pivotal policies. This situation may also influence public perceptions and voter sentiments ahead of upcoming elections, making it a focal point of political discourse in Sweden.