Rasmus Jarlov, chair of the Danish Defense Committee, reflects on his past support for the F-35 fighter jet, which is currently part of the Danish Air Force, while expressing regret over that decision due to changing geopolitical concerns. He emphasizes that the collaboration with the United States has evolved into a source of anxiety, as he fears potential pressures and manipulation from the Trump administration, which he believes could threaten Denmark's autonomy in defense matters.

In a recent statement on the platform X, Jarlov went as far as to urge global politicians to sever ties with the American defense sector to avoid being caught in a situation where they could face extortion from the U.S. He believes that even though the F-35 might still be the best fighter jet available, the risks associated with its procurement and the involvement of U.S. politics have now become a central concern for Danish policymakers. This shift in sentiment reflects broader issues within NATO and the complexities of international defense agreements, especially as the U.S. under Trump could apply disproportionate influence on allied nations.

Jarlov's comments point to a significant reevaluation within Danish defense policy, highlighting how individual leaders can impact international relations and defense strategies. As countries assess their partnerships with the U.S. and the implications of American political dynamics, similar sentiments may emerge among other NATO members, potentially reshaping alliances and procurement strategies moving forward.