Prostitution Doesn't Disturb: It's Disturbing to Name it Violence
The article argues that discussing prostitution as a form of violence is essential for women's rights, contrary to a misguided debate in feminist circles that portrays prostitution merely as a job.
The article contends that treating prostitution as merely a job undermines the serious implications it has for women's rights and safety. It criticizes the tendency within feminist discourse to elevate individual stories that present prostitution positively, dismissing the broader structural analysis that views it primarily as an exploitation of female bodies for male desires. According to the author, this approach is not an honest debate; rather, it is a political operation aimed at redefining prostitution as legitimate work while neglecting its inherent connection to violence.
Highlighting the tensions within feminist arguments about prostitution, the article emphasizes that no woman should feel compelled to sell her body to survive. There is a danger in framing the discussion around personal narratives that divert attention from the systemic issues and the violence involved in the sex trade. By focusing on exceptions rather than the rule, the feminist movement risks losing sight of the broader fight against sexual violence and exploitation.
Ultimately, the author calls for a reevaluation of how society discusses and understands prostitution, emphasizing that it should not be romanticized or rationalized as a form of labor but recognized as a profound violation of women's rights. The implications of this discussion extend far beyond personal choice, pointing to a need for structural change that truly empowers women rather than perpetuates their marginalization.