Feb 14 • 04:30 UTC 🇪🇸 Spain El País

The PSOE loses patience with González and sends ministers to discredit him

The PSOE faces internal conflict as several government members openly criticize former President Felipe González, suggesting he should leave the party for his repeated dissatisfaction with current leadership under Pedro Sánchez.

The relationship between the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) and its former leader and president, Felipe González, has escalated into open conflict. González has previously indicated that he would not vote for the PSOE if Pedro Sánchez continued as the candidate, opting instead to submit a blank ballot. His recent comments at a public forum in Madrid have particularly inflamed tensions, prompting a stronger backlash from the current government. González's criticisms were seen as particularly damaging given the current vulnerabilities of the PSOE, raising fears about party unity and electoral viability.

In response to González's remarks, various ministers from Sánchez's cabinet have taken a unified stand to publicly discredit him, signaling a dramatic shift from the previously cautious approach in dealing with their former leader. This collective response demonstrates the growing impatience within the PSOE and highlights leadership concerns as the party grapples with its identity and direction. González, often regarded as the architect of the PSOE's modern identity post-Franco, is now being challenged by those who feel his traditionalist views are at odds with the party’s current trajectory.

The implications of this rift extend beyond internal party dynamics, as it also raises questions about the PSOE's strategy heading into upcoming elections. With González's influence still significant among certain voter segments, the government's aggressive stance against him may alienate some former supporters. As the PSOE seeks to assert its current leadership under Sánchez, it must navigate the balance between honoring its past and forging ahead with a vision that resonates with contemporary voters, making this internal conflict critical to its future success.

📡 Similar Coverage