As Valentine's Day approaches, the custom of giving 'giri-choco' or obligatory chocolates in office settings is facing criticism for potentially crossing into harassment territory. Psychologist Ayano Funaki, who specializes in workplace harassment training, explains how the dynamics of power and gender can transform these seemingly harmless gestures into forms of harassment. According to Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, there are three critical factors that categorize behavior as harassment: 'superior relationships within the workplace,' 'demands extending beyond professional boundaries,' and 'actions that harm the work environment.'

There are two main types of harassment arising from the practice of exchanging chocolates: power harassment and sexual harassment. Power harassment can occur when a male superior coerces a female subordinate into giving chocolates, or when women are pressured into a custom of collectively giving chocolates under the threat of social repercussions. Additionally, situations where senior employees delegate the task of purchasing chocolates as a personal obligation can also be seen as forced labor. Meanwhile, sexual harassment may manifest as an expectation that women should serve men, or through inappropriate evaluations based on whether or not chocolates are given and the subsequent social invitations made under the pretense of thanking someone for their gift.

Recent incidents, such as the scandals involving Johnny’s Entertainment and Fuji TV, have intensified the scrutiny of such workplace customs. This has prompted discussions about the broader implications of seemingly innocent traditions and their potential to perpetuate a culture of harassment. As employees reassess the significance of these exchanges, many are questioning whether the act of giving chocolates, a tradition steeped in affection, has unintentionally facilitated a toxic work environment that deserves further examination.