The ongoing contract saga concerning rugby player Zac Lomax has intensified, with the Melbourne Storm facing accusations from the Parramatta Eels of attempting to enlist NRL officials to intervene in the situation. Lomax, who was released from the Eels after just one year into his original deal, is now caught in a legal struggle regarding his ability to sign with the Storm due to a specific clause in his release agreement. The Eels maintain that they have the rights to restrict Lomax from joining another NRL team before the end of his designated release period, which extends until 2028.

Accusations have surfaced that the Storm have sought assistance from NRL CEO Andrew Abdo to 'apply a blowtorch' to Parramatta, effectively pressuring them into compliance regarding Lomax's transfer. This move has raised eyebrows in the rugby community, suggesting that desperation may be driving Melbourne to utilize drastic measures to secure the player. As the situation unfolds, further legal proceedings are forthcoming as the matter will be taken to the NSW Supreme Court on March 2, adding an additional layer of complexity to the impending transition.

This situation not only highlights the intricate dealings and rivalries within the NRL but also raises questions regarding player contractual rights and the extent to which teams can exert influence over a player’s decisions post-release. As all sides prepare for the court hearing, the outcome will likely set a significant precedent for future player negotiations and team dynamics within the league.