Feb 13 • 18:32 UTC 🇸🇪 Sweden Aftonbladet

Migrationsverket on Emanuel's deportation decision: 'We warned about this'

An eight-month-old infant, Emanuel, faces deportation to Iran despite his parents holding residence permits in Sweden, a consequence of new immigration laws without transitional regulations.

Emanuel, an eight-month-old baby, is facing a deportation order to Iran, even though his parents have secured residence permits in Sweden. This unusual situation arises from recent changes to migration laws regarding labor migration that came into effect without transitional provisions. Jesper Tengroth, the press chief at the Migration Agency, indicated that they had warned about the potential ramifications of such a law change, suggesting that the agency foresaw complications that would affect vulnerable individuals like infants.

Initially, Emanuel's family arrived in Sweden under a student visa held by his mother, Masoumeh, who subsequently applied for asylum after the family faced a rejection. Following this, Masoumeh found employment and was granted a work permit, but the laws surrounding labor immigration shifted in April of last year, rendering her previous status obsolete. Consequently, the Migration Agency states that packages of law changes have made it impossible for Emanuel to be granted residency based on his mother's status since the law that applied at the time of her work permit issuance no longer exists.

This case highlights the alarming implications of abrupt legislative changes that have significant consequences for families and children. With many similar cases likely to arise due to the migration policy shift, there are concerns regarding the well-being of infants and children affected by the new legal framework. Public reaction to this situation may prompt discussions around the fairness and human impact of immigration laws, pointing to a need for careful consideration of transitional regulations that protect the rights of families during legislative updates.

📡 Similar Coverage