The Baneheia Committee has released a comprehensive report detailing the severe deficiencies in the legal proceedings that led to the wrongful conviction of Viggo Kristiansen. According to the report, which spans nearly 800 pages, the primary reason for Kristiansen's incorrect sentencing was a failure in evidence assessment. This has been described as a catastrophic failure within the Norwegian judicial system, implicating police, courts, and the reopening commission for their egregious errors, effectively stating that Kristiansen should never have been found guilty.

The report serves as a damning indictment of the Norwegian legal framework, particularly criticizing the decisions made by the courts and the lack of media scrutiny at the time. It illustrates how the most significant failures did not occur in the interrogation room but rather in the courtroom, shedding light on a broader issue of accountability within the justice system. The implications of these findings raise serious questions about the integrity of legal proceedings and the necessity for systemic reform to prevent similar injustices from occurring in the future.

As the inconsistencies within the case come to light, the report acknowledges the collective responsibility of various judicial entities and encourages a reevaluation of practices to safeguard against such miscarriages of justice. The Baneheia Committee's findings could pave the way for necessary discussions on improving the reliability of evidence evaluation and judicial processes, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding human rights within the legal landscape of Norway.