Recent reports indicate that Gintautas Paluckas, a member of the Lithuanian parliament and former Prime Minister, has been questioned as a special witness by the Special Investigation Service (STT). This new development has sparked reactions among politicians, prompting them to advise restraint in jumping to conclusions about the situation. A spokesperson for Prime Minister Inga Ruginienė expressed confidence in the competence of the legal authorities while urging politicians to avoid premature evaluations until a formal resolution is established.

The advice for restraint was echoed by political advisor Ignas Dobrovolskas, who emphasized the importance of waiting for authoritative findings before making any political assessments. He expressed no doubt about the legal authorities’ ability to conduct their work effectively, and stressed that immediate judgments could undermine the investigative process. The urging of caution serves as a reminder of the need for due process and the integrity of legal investigations, especially when involving public figures.

Commentary from another political figure, R. Budbergytė, indicated that the questioning of Paluckas should not come as a surprise, suggesting that such occurrences are not unusual in the realm of politics. This response reflects a broader understanding within political circles that investigations can often touch on individuals with political influence, and it highlights the ongoing complexities involved in governance and legal scrutiny in Lithuania today.