In a recent article, Tom McIlroy discusses Angus Taylor's repeated references to his grandfather, William Hudson, a significant figure in post-war Australian immigration. Hudson, a civil engineer, played a crucial role in bringing thousands of refugees from Europe to Australia, reflecting a commitment to diversity and labor that shaped the nation. Taylor's stories of Hudson, who faced political challenges in his work with the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Authority, serve to exemplify an Australian ethos of resilience and multiculturalism.

However, McIlroy argues that Taylor seems to have overlooked the core values embodied by his grandfather after ascending to the role of opposition leader in the Liberal Party. Despite celebrating Hudson's legacy of inclusivity and support for immigrants, Taylor’s recent actions suggest a departure from these principles. Just hours after taking on the leadership, he appeared to have forgotten the essential lessons of compassion and acceptance from his grandfather’s story, reflecting a troubling inconsistency in his political narrative.

This contradiction prompts a discussion about the broader implications of Taylor's immigration policies, particularly as they may push for a more isolationist or restrictive approach. Such a stance stands in stark contrast to the multi-ethnic contributions of immigrants to Australia’s development, as exemplified by Hudson's advocacy and efforts. This shift in tone and policy could represent a troubling trend within Australian politics that may endanger the multicultural fabric that has been fundamental to the nation's growth and identity.