During a plenary session in Strasbourg, Slovak MEP Katarína Roth Neveďalová from the Smer party addressed concerns over the rule of law and fundamental rights in Slovakia. She specifically rebutted claims made by some opposition politicians that Slovakia was expropriating land based on ethnic grounds, asserting that such allegations are unfounded. Roth Neveďalová emphasized her long-time experience in politics and expressed disappointment that some colleagues were swayed by what she termed 'nonsense' articulated by the opposition.

The debate highlighted significant political tensions surrounding the enforcement of the rule of law in Slovakia. MEPs discussed the alleged misuse of EU funds and potential violations of fundamental rights, a context in which Roth Neveďalová's remarks gained considerable attention. In this contentious atmosphere, she positioned herself as a defender of Slovak integrity, contesting the validity of accusations against her government and framing them as politically motivated.

Roth Neveďalová also touched on related legal reforms, addressing recent amendments to the Penal Code concerning the Beneš decrees and their implications. By refusing to acknowledge any concrete examples of ethnic-based expropriation, she aimed to fortify her stance that Slovakia maintains adherence to EU values, despite internal criticisms that suggest otherwise. Her statement represents a broader narrative in Slovak politics where the ruling party seeks to counter international scrutiny with internal affirmations of state conduct.